Evaluating Web Sites - Examples 5 & 6
Here are the final two examples.
The Moral
Status of Animals
http://ethics.acusd.edu/Applied/Animals/index.html
FURISDEAD.com
http://www.furisdead.com/
Remembering that this tutorial is not for or
against animal rights but, rather, about evaluating web
pages and web sites, think about this:
-
After visiting FURISDEAD.com, do you
feel you have a reasoned basis to consider whether or
not you are opposed to wearing fur? If so, are you
also opposed to wearing leather belts and shoes or
eating fish, hot dogs, cheese, chicken, etc.? Why
or why not? Has there been an appeal to your
reason about the status of animals?
-
After visiting The Moral Status of
Animals, does it appear that there might be a reasoned basis to
consider whether or not to eat animals, wear animal
products, use them in experiments and tests? Why or why not?
-
Which
web site do you think provides the kind of information
that would help you write an objective paper on animal
rights or some aspect of it? Feel free to see what
you can find out about the sources (people, institutions)
and content of these two web sites using:
A Final Word
about Evaluating Information on the Internet:
Ask Your
Instructor. |
|
Whether information is in electronic or
traditional format, quality still comes down to the credentials of
the source, and the objectivity and rationality of
the content. Members of the faculty are
possessors of advanced degrees in their subject
areas and have years of experience in evaluating
information. If you're not sure of the quality
of a web page or site, ask your instructor.
(Of course, you can always ask a
librarian too.) |
|